The first time I ever met new North Tampa Bay Chamber (NTBC) Board chair Tony Benge was at the NTBCâs annual meeting back in December, when he was sworn in with the rest of the NTBCâs 2026 Board of Directors and we were introduced to each other by NTBC president and CEO Hope Kennedy.
At that time, Mr. Benge and I agreed that we should sit down to discuss his vision for his tenure as the new Chamber Board chair, as well as his primary role as the president of Benge Development Corp., which has been based in Orlando since 1994, but also has one current development project in Pasco County and recently had its original Pasco development plan denied by the Board of County Commissioners.
Although neither of those projects is located in Wesley Chapel, the denied âFletcher Projectâ (more on that below) was located at the intersection of S.R. 52 and U.S. Hwy. 41 in Land OâLakes, immediately adjacent to the Moffitt Speros campus we told you about last issue.
The other project, called the Hawes MPUD, which is moving forward, sits north of Wesley Chapel and east of the Mirada development. both north and south of S.R. 52, east of Handcart Rd. in San Antonio, and is approved for up to 523 multi-family units (see map below).Â
His Benge Development Corp. has developed more than 30 large-scale projects, mainly in Orlando and Apopka, FL.
Benge, who introduced Floridaâs Lieutenant Governor Jay Collins at the NTBC Business Breakfast on Feb. 3 (see story on page 8), also asked Lt. Gov. Collins about mobility and school impact fees, subjects Benge knows a lot about because his company has to pay them every time he develops a new project.
âImpact fees have started to cripple a lot of the [development] industry,â he said to Collins. âFor a typical residential unit, as an average, $30,000 per unit is now being levied. When they were originally passed, [these fees] were specifically to be limited to incremental new capacity for things like schools, roads, sewer and water treatment plants. But, weâve paid into this now for a decade and thereâs been no accountability. You canât get any information from these counties, which seize the money, in essence. And yet, they have no new schools or anything else to point to. How do we get accountability for this?â
Collins responded, âItâs got to be statewide legislation. It canât be executive action. It has to go through the legislature and itâs got to be codified into law. There has to be some form of accountability in that system.â
He added, however, âBut, valid impact fees? I think we all agree that valid is a good word. We can do that, but the accountability has to be there. I donât think DOGE ( (the Dept. of Government Efficiency) is something we should just do once and walk away from. I think sustained accountability and predictability for our people matters. Weâre going to have to implement that.â
State Senator Danny Burgess, of course, presented a different solution when he was the guest speaker at an NTBC âCoffee &Â Connectionsâ event two years ago, before DOGE even existed, saying that he wanted to see an audit of every county regarding impact fees.Â
Benge agreed that an audit showing how much impact fee money has been collected and what that money was spent on would be a good way to hold counties accountable for the impact fees they collect.
He says that although Pascoâs impact fees are among the highest in the state, âOsceola Countyâs are actually the highest. Theyâve really become insane, literally. The night [Osceola] did the most recent increase, there were probably 20 developers in the audience, representing hundreds of millions of dollars in projects. I told them, âIf you pass this, just throw our application in the trash.â
He added that for a typical 300-unit apartment complex, the developer has to pay $9 million in impact fees to get a building permit.
âI mean, weâre already building all of the roads, improvements… weâre having to do turn lanes, traffic signals, water, sewer, bus stops, all of that. And we still have to pay regular taxes and everything else.â
Benge also told me that impact fees first started back in 2000, with something called the âMartinez Doctrine,â which was named after former Orange County Chair and U.S. Sen. Mel Martinez, who served as Secretary of Housing & Urban Development under U.S. President George W. Bush. The Martinez Doctrine attempted to limit school overcrowding by requiring local developers to address school capacity issues before breaking ground.Â
âThe idea was that growth should have to pay for itself, which makes sense,â Benge said, âBut the trade-off was supposed to be that we will always have utilities and roads and services available to go along with this.
âSo when these impact fees first started, I donât know who came up with the numbers, but theyâre so abominably disproportionate. Weâve actually tracked some of the apartment communities, which might have kids in only 20% of the complexâs units. So, on 300 units, Iâd have maybe 60 units that have kids, I paid $6 million in impact fees for the construction of new schools, which is basically 1/3 of a whole [700-student) schoolhouse for 60 kids. And, Iâm still paying taxes every year, too. These fees were supposed to only be used for new school construction, but they never gave me any data.â
Benge also said he decided to go about it a different way. âLetâs just track how many homes and apartments were built from, letâs say, 2015 through 2025. So, I made up a number, letâs say 100,000 units were built. Each one paid $14,000 per unit. Whereâs that $1.4 billion? Or, list me out the new schools thatâve been built with that money, with the budget you spent on each one.
âA K-8 school right now costs $18-$20 million, a high school is upwards of $50 million, and that would house, in Orange County, up to 5,000 students. By our estimation, there should have been around 84 new schools built during that time â and they only have three.
âSo, whereâs all that money? [Counties arenât] allowed to use it for [their] general funds. You canât use it to pay more administrators. This money should be segregated out and if itâs not, this is a big issue.â
He added that many of the assumptions used by counties to set their school impact fees, âare horribly flawed. If I build a 300-unit apartment complex and a third of those units are one-bedroom units, how many kids live in one-bedroom apartments? Historical precedence says that only unless someone is building a house that isnât ready yet, one-bedroom units donât generate any kids, yet I still have to pay the same school impact fees for those units. Itâs crazy.â
The Fletcher Project
Speaking of crazy, Benge said that his Fletcher Project â named for the family that owned the 100-acre property â was originally planned in Aug. 2024 for 350 multi-family units, about 160 townhomes and 25,000 sq. ft. of commercial uses and had been through more than a year of meetings and plans when Pascoâs commissioners voted last year to deny it.
âThe big pushback was the private, never-permitted airstrip from the 1950s next door, which would have prevented us from building anything on 1/3 of the property. We agreed to not build on that portion, but we asked to have the same density on the rest of the property. So, we wouldnât build as [many total units], and they turned us down. We started with Plan A and were up to Plan Q, and they still turned us down.â
Hawes MPUD
Despite that setback in Pasco, Benge Development is moving forward with its plan for the Hawes MPUD (marked in red on map below). The project will extend Handcart Rd. to the north, with 396 multi-family units on the south side and 127 townhomes on the north side and some neighborhood commercial (grocery store, etc.) entitlements. The Hawes project was approved in 2023, but Benge has not yet begun building at that site.
Jonathanâs Landing
Benge also is building Jonathanâs Landing, the first adult autistic facility in the U.S., in Lake Nona, FL. âIt will have 5,000 beds and bring 5,000 jobs to that area,â Benge said. âMy friend, Jason Eichenholz, has a son named Jonathan who is an adult with autism. This will help so many adults because state support for [developmentally disabled] people ends at age 18.â
Look for more info about Tony Benge and his vision for the NTBC in our next issue.
Editorâs note â The motivation for writing this story came from a post by Kelly Gilroy on her outstanding Pasco County Development & Growth Updates Facebook page. Former Florida Department of Transportation engineer â and, of course, Neighborhood News correspondent Joel Provenzano agreed that it was worth a deeper dive into what Kelly so perfectly presented. â GN
If youâve driven around Wesley Chapel lately, you donât need a traffic study to know one thing: Pasco County is growing fast. New neighborhoods, shopping centers, hospitals and medical offices and industrial parks seem to pop up overnight. With all of that growth comes an obvious question:
Who actually pays for the roads, sidewalks, and transportation infrastructure we all use?
The simple answer, of course, is âall of us,â but one of the biggest pieces of that answer is something called âmobilityâ (aka âimpactâ) fees.
What Are Mobility Fees, Anyway?
Mobility fees are one-time charges paid by developers each time a new building permit is issued. These fees help pay for the transportation improvements needed to support new growth, such as:
âą New or widened roads
âą Turn lanes and intersections
âą Sidewalks and bike paths
âą Other transportation facilities tied to development
In simple terms: new development helps pay for the new infrastructure it requires â and Pasco County has some of the highest impact fees of any county in Florida.
These fees donât replace gas taxes or sales taxes, but they work alongside them to fund transportation
Itâs also important to note that mobility fees are just one type of impact fee charged on new development in Pasco County. New construction is also subject to school impact fees, which help fund new schools and classroom capacity. And, park impact fees are used for land acquisition and creating new recreational facilities.
Together, transportation, school and park impact fees make up the bulk of the one-time charges paid when new homes and commercial projects are built. When combined, Pasco Countyâs total impact fee burden is often cited as among the highest in the region, reflecting both its rapid growth and the scale of infrastructure needed to support that growth
Why Are Mobility Fees Going Up?
Construction costs have skyrocketed in recent years. Roadway materials, labor and engineering costs have all increased â often sharply. Because of this, mobility fees have to be periodically updated to reflect the real cost of building roads today, instead of the costs from ten years ago.
Pasco County is allowed to update its mobility fee schedule every four years, and those updates are reviewed and recommended by the countyâs Planning Commission, which looks at growth projections, construction costs and long-term transportation needs.
According to the county, Pasco is projected to add approximately 330,000 new residents over the next 20 to 25 years, requiring roughly 950 new lane miles of roads. Even with existing revenue sources, projected funding falls short of the need âwhich is why mobility fees matter.
How Much $ Are We Talking About?
Hereâs a concrete example that helps put things in perspective:
âą A single-family home built in Pasco in 2026 will carry a one-time mobility fee of $11,660 that is paid by the builder.
âą That money goes into county coffers for roads, sidewalks and transportation facilities.
The fee is paid once â not annually, and not by the homeowner directly at tax time. A common question is whether mobility and other impact fees on new homes are ultimately passed along to homebuyers. While opinions vary, there is little evidence this is happening in todayâs market.
In many cases, new-construction homes in Pasco are priced equal to â or even less than âc comparable resale homes, which carry no such fees. Builders are also routinely offering substantial incentives, including covering large portions of closing costs and providing builder-financed mortgages with rates currently as low as 3.99% for 30 years.
Based on current pricing trends and transaction data, impact fees do not appear to be quietly âadded backâ elsewhere in the deal. As a result, despite these one-time development fees, new construction remains one of the most competitive and accessible options for buyers today.
Why Some Businesses Pay Nothing
This is where things get nuanced â and are often misunderstood by homeowners.
Pasco County doesnât charge the same mobility fees to every type of development. Instead, it offers incentives to encourage certain kinds of businesses that bring higher-paying jobs and long-term economic growth, including medical & professional offices, industrial, logistics, warehouses, distribution centers and hotels
These uses currently receive a 100% incentive, meaning they pay $0 in mobility fees.
On the other hand, a fast-food restaurant with a drive-through might be charged a mobility fee of around $80,569, because it receives only a 25% incentive.
Why the difference? County officials have been clear about their goal: âPasco is open for business,â especially for industries that diversify the tax base and bring higher-wage jobs to the county.
Who Covers The Rest Of The Cost?
This is where something called Tax Increment Financing (TIF) comes in.
TIF is often mentioned alongside mobility fees, but they work very differently:
âą Mobility fees are one-time payments made upfront by developers.
âą TIF uses future property tax growth to fund infrastructure over time.
Pasco County, âlocks inâ property tax values at a base year (2012 for unincorporated Pasco). As development happens and property values rise, the increase in tax revenue â the âincrementâ â is set aside.
About 33% of that increment is dedicated specifically to transportation improvements.
Those TIF funds are then used to âbuy downâ mobility fees for targeted developments like offices, industrial sites and hotels. In other words, the county â and its taxpayers â still funds the roads, but with future tax growth instead of charging those businesses up front for them.
Other Ways Infrastructure Is Built
Mobility fees arenât the only way roads and infrastructure come online:
âą Developers often build roads, turn lanes and/or sidewalks themselves as part of their residential or commercial projects and dedicate them to the county.
âą If those improvements benefit more than just the residents of those developments, the developers can apply for mobility fee credits.
âą Some communities (including many in Wesley Chapel) are built with Community Development Districts (CDDs) â quasi-governmental entities that maintain roads, sidewalks and landscaping within the developments themselves, rather than the county taking on that responsibility long-term.
This approach shifts some maintenance costs away from the county and onto the developments that directly benefit from them.
Why This Should Matter To You!
At the end of the day, mobility fees are about matching new growth with new infrastructure â and making sure existing residents arenât left paying the full bill for new development.
Mobility fees are imperfect, complex and often controversial. But without them, Pasco County would face even larger funding gaps, even slower road improvements and even more pressure on general taxes.
As Pasco continues to grow, understanding how these fees work can help you better engage in conversations about development, transportation and the future of our community.
The growth is coming, no matter what. The real question is how we plan and pay for it.
And, most people sitting in traffic every day in Wesley Chapel believe that they are the ones paying for it â and that whatever money is coming in isnât either not enough or not being spent fast enough to keep up â and no, theyâre not wrong.
North Tampa Bay Chamber President Hope Kennedy hosted a lively âCoffee & Conversationâ event on Oct. 1 at the Fairfield Inn in Wesley Chapel with State Senator Danny Burgess. (Photos by Charmaine George)
Anyone who knows District 23 State Senator Danny Burgess is aware that heâs not your typical politician. That fact was obvious during Sen. Burgessâ appearance at the North Tampa Bay Chamberâs âCoffee & Conversationâ event at the Fairfield Inn on Lajuana Blvd. on Oct. 1, which proved to be more than just the usual pre-election âLook at all Iâve accomplishedâ speech most incumbents and candidates engage in when they make public appearances.
In fact, during his conversation with Chamber president & CEO Hope Kennedy and about 40 Chamber members and guests, Sen. Burgess hardly talked about himself at all and was clearly serious when he said he fully supports Wesley Chapel incorporating and becoming its own city! (See below)
He also discussed the seriousness of Hurricane Helene (this was ten days before Hurricane Milton hit Florida) and what the state can do and is doing to help the Gulf Coast recover following the storm to ensure that those affected by Helene can still get insurance after such major storms. He also discussed why Pasco and other counties donât seem to be spending their impact fees to mitigate the actual impacts of all of this development, and so much more.
Kennedy started the âCoffee & Conversationâ event with a moment of silence for the victims of Helene and Sen. Burgess thanked her for doing that because, âOne part of you feels bad for driving on as normal, a little bit, but the other part of you feels an obligation to help, too, because that could easily be us. I think anyone who lives in the State of Florida recognizes that, when you see someone else in the path of the storm, thereâs a lot of humility that blows over you because the next one could be you.â
He added, âBe thankful that you donât live on the coast because I canât even tell you the number of people we personally know who just lost their homes. We have a lot to be thankful for, but we also have to think about, âHow can we help them?ââ
When asked what else the state can do to help the thousands of Floridians whose homes were either completely destroyed or rendered uninhabitable by Helene, Burgess said, âImagine the worst and itâs that bad. Many of those homes are probably going to have to be knocked down and rebuilt, on stilts hopefully, because the surge is coming again. How many of those people now, after the last three storms, are saying, âI loved the idea of being on the beach but this isnât for me anymore?â The problem is that they could be stuck, canât get out because whether itâs interest rates or the cost of other homes, itâs cost-prohibitive, so theyâre trapped.â
He then mentioned a number of resources available to help the people affected by Helene.
âWe have activated the small business bridge loans through the Dept. of Commerce, which is a great resource offering zero-interest loans to businesses impacted by the storm,â he said.
âIf youâre involved in the agriculture, like an actual farm or an agricultural business, weâre offering up to a $500,000 bridge loan, through Ag commissioner Wilton Simpsonâs office.Â
âBut, for individuals, we have Hope Florida. Itâs an amazing connection point for all of the assets that our state provides that nobody knows about, because thereâs a communication gap. The reason Hope Florida was created was to solve that problem, plus that gap, for the resident, the individual, the impacted constituent. Please stress this to your readers to call 1-833-GET-HOPE. It was a program established by our First Lady (Casey DeSantis) and supported by the Governor. Itâs been an amazing resource. There are Hope Florida buses on the west coast of our state providing comfort care for people, the essentials. Is there an easy, quick fix to this situation? Absolutely not. But, can we do all we can to help our brothers and sisters in need? Yes. And, Hope Florida is that connection point for our state. Itâs really still in its infancy, but I think Helene is testing its grit and its resilience and validating that it is needed.â
Kennedy also had Sen. Burgess, who is running for re-election to his State Senate Dist. 23 seat (against Democratic candidate Ben Braver and John Houman, who is running as an independent candidate; see pg. 10 for details), explain the location of his District.
âI was born and raised in Zephyrhills and Iâm still there and Zephyrhills is still in the heart of my District, which is awesome, but I represent from the Pasco-Hernando line to the north, Dade City on the north side, Trinity and Odessa to the west and the Polk line at Plant City to the east, all the way down to Brandon to the south. My District includes Dover, Seffner, New Tampa and Wesley Chapel, Land OâLakes and Lutz. This is home. Itâs everywhere Iâve grown up. I love that the municipalities of Dade City, Zephyrhills and Plant City are part of my District. And, all of New Tampa north of I-75. Only Tampa Palms is not in my District.âÂ
On Wesley Chapel Incorporation
As to why he is hoping Wesley Chapel becomes its own city, Burgess said, âI was driving home through Wesley Chapel with my dad from the Bucs game on a recent Sunday and out of his mouth, not mine, he said, âI just donât understand why Wesley Chapel doesnât incorporate. This area just has so much to offer. They need to take control of their destiny.â
And, from the man who at age 17 became the youngest mayor in the country when he was elected Mayor of Zephyrhills, âBeing the mayor of your town is the best gig on earth.â
Kennedy interjected that the conversation about incorporation, âHas been percolating again. For those who donât know, it was back in 2012 when the Chamber (then the Greater Wesley Chapel Chamber of Commerce) took a position to facilitate that conversation, but it just became such a heavy lift. We remembered that back in 2009, Will Weatherford (who was our areaâs State Representative but had not yet become the Speaker of the Florida House), was able to pass some legislation that actually gave Wesley Chapel the opportunity to incorporate itself without having to go to the state for permission.â
âIs that still on the books?,â Burgess asked.
To which Kennedy responded, âI believe it is. I hope it is. We havenât looked at it recently, but thatâs what started the conversation.â
âIf I could accomplish one thing before Iâm done,â Burgess said, âIâd like to be able to say âWesley Chapel is officially a city. with its own governing body.ââ
And, although the idea received boisterous applause from the Chamber members in attendance at the meeting, most of the online commenters on the post I put up on our Facebook page a couple of days later were mostly against incorporation.
But, NTBC Board member Jamie Hess, who also was in attendance for the coffee event, said that, âWeâve had about five meetings about it and our Board is really going to push for it.â
âThat makes me so happy,â Burgess said. âLook, there is a stigma attached to adding â as some of my friends in Tallahassee say â another layer of bureaucracy, but the reality is that it allows you to have a distinct identity, which this community does. But, more than that, there is a missing link when you donât have that very localized, closest-to-the-people form of government. I just personally believe and yes, Iâve learned this first-hand, that living in a municipality doesnât mean youâre not affiliated with the county. In Zephyrhills, we had fire services through the county, but the county understandably has a very large footprint and a lot of area to cover. But, as a city, you can control your destiny and most important, your culture â that Main Street feel, thatâs what I love the most about it. Wesley Chapel has that feel, but we just need to take control of the ship, especially with everything I know is coming here.â
Kennedy added, âItâs so exciting to be in a community youâre literally building it out of the ground. That conversation that is happening, so stay tuned.â
There was a noticeable groan when I asked where the boundaries for the City of Wesley Chapel would be drawn.
âThatâs where it died the last time,â Kennedy admitted. âThe Chamber put up signs (on Wesley Chapel Blvd.) but the people in Lutz insisted on them coming down. The Census Designated Places (CDPs) through the U.S. Census Bureau uses natural boundaries to determine CDPs, so we looked at Cypress Creek as that natural boundary, but the Lutz folks wanted it drawn at I-75 which is not a natural boundary. We assume the planned boundary [of the City of Wesley Chapel] would be at the CDP boundary of Cypress Creek.â
Insurance Issues
After moving on from the incorporation discussion, Kennedy said that a survey she conducted through the Florida Chamber of Commerce showed that the #1 issue for most folks in Florida is insurance.
âGiven the crisis with the recent storm, insurance is going to continue to be a big issue,â Kennedy said. âCan you give us a lay of the land from Tallahasseeâs perspective?â
And, although Burgess sad he was no longer on the Insurance Committee in the Legislature, he said, âWe had multiple sessions and special sessions to address that issue. From a legislative prospective, Iâm sure thereâs more that we can do. However, we did so much in the last couple of cycles that we ripped the Band-Aid off of many issues â from tort reform to how insurers operate to checks and balances in that realm.â
He added, âWe are starting to see, and I says âstarting,â because I donât want to be insensitive, because itâs not over, but we are starting to see the fruits of those investments. We are starting to see big insurers re-commit to the Florida marketplace â like State Farm, which is a huge one because they had pulled out, but theyâre coming back in. It isnât going to happen overnight. In government, we probably went a little too long without trying to adequately address the problem. It does take 18-24 months to start to see that pendulum swing back into a balance but I do believe that, after the series of three to four reforms we did over the last couple of years, that we are starting to see a re-stabilization of the market. And Iâm speaking as someone who lost their home insurance recently and was put into Citizens (the insurer of last resort in Florida). Weâve only been with Citizens for maybe a month. But, weâre already getting notices from other insurance companies [offering to insure us]. So, it is happening.â
Of course, after the devastating storm surge of Helene (and now major damage even our area received from Hurricane Milton), Burgess said, âThe question is what happens next? Are these individuals going to be able to get insurance after this storm? Because theyâre not allowed to pull out right after the impact happens. Thatâs bad faith and weâre not going to let that happen. It shouldnât happen and if it is happening, the [State] Insurance Commission needs to know.â
But, looking forward after the repairs, he said, âIf a future storm [like Milton] happens and has a similar impact, how do we balance that? Because, at the end of the day, everyone in Florida is paying that price. So, we have a big issue on our hands as a state. So, we have to start having some really tough conversations as to how to move forward on that.â
He also mentioned that auto insurance is another major issue. âFlorida is a no-fault state so you carry at least $10,000 in personal injury protection (PIP) and the other person does, too, so no matter whose fault it is, you just take care of yourself. But, $10,000 is a product of 1976. Itâs gone the second you enter an ER door. So, thatâs inadequate coverage and the biggest cost driver in our system right now. So, if we pass mandatory bodily injury coverage and have a threshold of at least $25,000, thatâs how we get back to responsibility and also a balance in the force when it comes to auto insurance rates.â
Burgess also said that because living in Florida is so desirable, the cost of everything here is going up. âInflation is real,â he said. âInterest rates are through the roof, our homes are valued at far more than we ever purchased them for â because, in large part, of the number of individuals wanting to move here. So, weâve got a lot to be thankful for but also the âback endâ effects and I think those are some of the things weâre trying to rectify.â
Kennedy then opened it up to questions from those in attendance, âBut with the caveat that the Chamber is a bi-partisan organization. We are here for pro-business legislation and for having conversations with our elected officials.â
Regarding The âLive Localâ Act
Kennedy then asked Burgess about people who make a decent living who still canât afford to buy or rent homes/apartments in our area.
Burgess said, âThe âLive Local Actâ was supposed to assist the âmissing middleâ (class). Its intent was pure and it was a good bill but it did have some flaws. Weâre still working through it and there are a couple of things we still need to address, a few gaps that need to be filled, but what it was supposed to do, from Pascoâs perspective, was help those who work in Pasco County be able to afford to live here â or any of many other counties throughout the state. We want the working class middle to be able to afford to live near where they work.â
He added, âIt passed unanimously! It wasnât until after it passed and the Governor signed it that anybody said, âHold the phone.â So, the biggest âkumbayaâ thing ever in Tallahassee became this huge explosion.â
Regarding Impact Fees
Burgess said that impact fees are one of his pet peeves. âIf youâre a governmental entity in the I-4 corridor, whether county or city, and youâre hurting for money, I think we need to consider that thereâs been a mismanagement of funds.â
Attendee Carlos Saenz (photo below), the owner of two Dairy Queens and Fazoliâs on S.R. 54, said that for two Dairy Queens in Pasco, âI stroked a $140,000 check just for the impact fees. It feels punitive for the privilege of creating jobs in the county.âÂ
And where did that impact fee go?,â Burgess responded. âDid you ever get a notice? We had an impact fee bill this year and in my Senate version of the bill, I wanted to know if the impact fees a county is collecting are going to help the areas that the business or development is impacting.â
Kennedy said, âWe actually made a pitch to Pasco County to reallocate some of those impact fees, but theyâre so splattered that we couldnât get a definitive answer [as to how theyâre spent].â
Burgess said, âHave you ever looked at your personal finances and said, âWhere did it all go?â I think itâs the same principle for the county, or any government, because Iâm not just picking on Pasco. If you [had to] put those impact fees in a separate pot and itemized it, maybe you could have insured that it went in a certain direction. We had a bill to do just that but it didnât pass.â
And, Burgess said, âThatâs not only a problem with commercial land. The impact fees alone on a piece of land we wanted to buy in Zephyrhills kept us from putting an offer down. I didnât have an extra $20,000 to put down for that vacant property.â
When Kennedy asked what could be done about the impact fee situation, Burgess asked for help mobilizing other chambers and business organizations to get behind a possible impact fee bill in the next session. âI love the state organizations but they get wrapped up in politics sometimes,â Burgess said. âI think all of you would benefit tremendously from passing a piece of legislation like a transparency act for impact fees, with them allocated to the area where the impact is taking place â other than the schools. We donât want to take impact fees from them and the bill that didnât pass specifically did not take away from the impact fees schools would receive. I think our team has that bill included in our 2025 âbill trackerâ for the next session.â
Burgess agreed about having impact fee caps and thresholds on the state level, âBut, I think for us to put artificial caps on everything without knowing what the true costs of the impacts to these areas are, we might still be needing to fix something on the back end, like with Live Local. I think the first step is transparency and that the impact fees are going to the areas being impacted. And then, from the transparency piece, weâre going to be able to identify âThatâs extortion.â A lot of my colleagues in Tallahassee just want to blow the whole system up, but that will create a lot more problems than you solve. So, Iâm of the mind, as a military guy, to tactically find where the impacts are taking place before attempting to cap it or moderate it.â
Kennedy added, âOur Board also suggested that the county should have an ordinance to re-allocate those funds from âCapitalâ to âOperational,â so they could use whatâs already there to get the ball moving, but we hit a brick wall with that as well. So, we want to work through the state instead.â
Burgess agreed that impact fees should be something thatâs uniform across the state, âsince there should be nothing to hide, in theory.â